Our successful campaign to stop Westminster City Council criminalising the giving of free food to the homeless.

Why is Soup Run important?

Westminster City Council has dropped the planned byelaw to criminalise the giving of free food to the homeless. The council dropped the scheme following positive negotiations and compromises on all sides. If the authority was to seek to reintroduce such a byelaw in future, it would have to embark upon its entire consultation process from scratch.

How can I get involved and take action?

Sign up for email updates

Tell me more about Soup Run

Liberty press release: Sense at St Paul’s and also in Westminster – as Council drops soup run ban

In 2011, Westminster Council proposed a bye-law to make it a crime to give out a free cup of soup to homeless people in Victoria.

Westminster Council said that charitable soup runs were an impediment to their ‘humanitarian ambition’ to reduce rough sleeping to zero and put people in contact with services which will take them off the streets. In short, they believed criminalising soup runs will stop large numbers of homeless people gathering in the area.

No one sleeps rough for a free sandwich
Liberty, along with many other third sector sector organisations working in this area, believed the proposed byelaw was fundamentally flawed. No one sleeps rough for a free sandwich.

An independent study by the London School of Economics Housing consultancy group agreed. It concluded that rather than perpetuating a damaging street lifestyle soup runs actually provide a safety net for those who have slipped through the system. They were also found to provide a valuable form of support that homeless people – as well as those who are in supported accommodation – do not find elsewhere.

We urged Westminster Council to drop the proposed byelaws, which were an offence against common decency, common values and common sense.

One need only look to similarly ill-judged powers, such as the power to arrest the homeless under the Vagrancy Act or dispersal powers under antisocial behaviour legislation, to see that the approach is flawed: it targets at-risk individuals with criminal sanctions which will only make their problems harder to overcome, it fails to address the root causes of homelessness, and at best only displaces homeless individuals elsewhere.

>> A Nasty Taste

>> Is this ‘The Big Society’? Liberty demands Westminster council abandon plans to ban soup runs

>> Westminster Soup run byelaw - Legal opinion

>> Letter to Westminster City Councillors

>> Letter to Guardian

>> Blog: No one sleeps rough for a free sandwich

>> Liberty's response to the consultation

>> Housing Justice's Westminster Byelaw Campaign