TPIMs
allow for punishment without trial. Individuals are tagged, subjected to an
overnight residence requirement, and are restricted as to where they can go, who
they can talk to and who they can associate with.
- TPIMs don’t keep us safe – suspects should be tried in court and locked up
if they are dangerous.
- TPIMs have replaced the discredited control order regime,
but there is little difference between the two - TPIMs are simply a form of
‘control order lite’.
- Just like control orders, TPIMs are initiated by the Home
Secretary - and the regime still runs outside the criminal justice system of
investigation, arrest, charge and conviction.
Even worse, unlike the control order regime, which had to
be renewed by Parliament every year, the TPIMs Act does not come up for
parliamentary renewal for five years. That means Government no longer has to
justify this departure from the rule of law annually, and we’re in danger of
normalising what was originally intended to be exceptional.
>>
TPIMs and Control Orders comparison table (October 2011)
Liberty’s
objections to control orders:
- Unsafe – TPIMs
allow potentially dangerous people to live at home with limited
supervision. In the past, some of those suspects on control orders disappeared
whilst under an order. That risk remains unchanged with the TPIMs regime.
- Unfair – TPIMs
place potentially unending restrictions on liberty
and a raft of dehumanizing sanctions on people who may have no convictions
and who can never clear their name.
- Threat to
fair trial – TPIMs by-pass criminal
justice and the safeguards that guarantee fair
trial.
TPIMs suffer from the same flaws as the control orders they replace.
Successive legal rulings revoked individual control orders and the consequent
cost to the public purse was huge. Given TPIMs are equally restrictive the
litigation is unlikely to stop now.
When it came into power, the Coalition Government announced an urgent review
of the control order policy as part of the Counter Terror and Security Powers
Review 2010 (read our
response as a PDF). Both parties opposed control orders while in
Opposition, but in the lead up to the TPIMs announcement the question of
whether to scrap control orders or keep them revealed a deep fault line between
the Coalition parties - read Chronology
of a car crash? to find out more.
More information