Yarls Wood families' detention ruled unlawful
Press Release
Yarls Wood families' detention ruled unlawful
Today at the High Court, two families held at Yarls Wood Immigration Detention Centre have succeeded in their claims that they were unlawfully detained. Suppiah and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department concerned two mothers and their young children who were locked up last year after dawn raids on their homes.
The judge
also noted that ‘no one can seriously dispute that detention is capable of
causing significant and in some instances long lasting harm to
children’.
Emma Norton,
Liberty’s legal officer who
intervened in the case, said:
“The UK
Border Agency failed these families – prison is no place for a child. The Court
has acknowledged how detention damages children. Surely the Government can’t run
away from its promise to end this shameful
practice.”
The Court
found that there was little evidence that UKBA had considered its duty to
safeguard and promote the welfare of the children when deciding whether to
detain the families. The Family Welfare Form, the basis on which key operational
decisions are made, was incorrectly and poorly completed in both cases. For one
family, there was ‘not a shred of evidence’ that UKBA had considered the welfare
of their two-year-old child when deciding to detain
them.
The children
still suffer the effects of their detention, with one child (aged 11 at the
time) now diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress
Disorder.
Contact:
Liberty’s press office on 020 7378
3656 or 07973 831 128
Notes to
Editors
- Liberty
has obtained information under the Freedom of Information Act which shows that in
2009 alone, 1065 children were held in immigration detention. The longest period
a child was held in 2009 was 158 days and the average period of detention was
two weeks.
- Prior to 2001, children were
detained in immigration detention only very rarely. In 2001 the policy was
changed and UKBA was authorised by the then Government to detain children
according to the same criteria as adults. The numbers of children in detention
then started increasing significantly. This change was brought in without
consultation and without evidence justifying the change. The Government
continued to insist that it would only detain children in exceptional
circumstances and only to effect removal. However, it quickly transpired that
this was not (and is not) how the policy is being implemented by UKBA – children
are routinely detained as a first and not a last resort, without any
alternatives being explored and most critically, without the child’s welfare
being taken into account.
- The families in this case were
detained in January/February 2010. One mother and her daughter (aged two at the
time of detention) were held for over two weeks; the other mother and her two
sons (aged 11 and two at the time) were held for two weeks. Liberty presented evidence in Court to show that even short
periods in immigration detention cause serious harm to children, including the
specific children in this case. Further information is available on request to
the Liberty press office.
MORE ITEMS LIKE THIS
EMAIL LIST
Join our email list for regular campaign updates
Please
join Liberty today and help protect our fundamental rights and
freedoms. The support of our members makes all our work possible.