HomeAboutJoinNews & Events IssuesPublicationsContact
  • Liberty seeks to intervene in cross and niqab “freedom of conscience” cases

  • 16 Oct 2006
  • Liberty announced today that it will seek to intervene in two cases involving individuals’ right to freedom of religion and thought.
  • The cases, which involve a British Airways worker banned from wearing a cross and a teaching assistant who was suspended for wearing the niqab, may further polarize communities amidst the current political furore over British Muslim women who wear traditional dress. 
     
    Director of Liberty, Shami Chakrabarti said: 
     
    “There is nothing more British than religious tolerance. It is particularly shocking that the recent so-called ‘mature debate’ may have prompted physical attacks on women in traditional dress. 
     
    We need more sensible analysis of these cases and the proportionality of employment practice rather than howls of outrage from all sides.” 
     
    Liberty also expressed concern over reports of new Government plans for university staff to inform on their politically active or extreme students. Liberty would have concerns about any discriminatory practice that would undermine trust between teachers and students. 
     
    Contact: Jen Corlew on 0207 378 3656 or 0797 3 831 128 
     
    NOTES TO EDITORS
     
    1. Aisah Azmi was suspended by the Headfield Church of England Junior School in Dewsbury, West Yorkshire for wearing the full Muslim veil, or niqab, while working as a teaching assistant.
     
    2. Nadia Eweida, a Christian British Airways check-in worker, claims she was forced to take unpaid leave after refusing to remove a small cross from her necklace.
     
    3. As an intervener in the cases, Liberty will not represent either party but will provide principled arguments on the necessity and proportionality of employer interference with freedom of conscience and expression.
     
    4. Article 9 of the Human Rights Act protects an individual’s right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This is not an absolute right but is subject only to interference that is necessary, proportionate and in accordance with law.
     
    5. Commons Leader Jack Straw began the controversy when he admitted on 6 October 2006 to asking Muslim women if they would remove full veils when visiting his constituency offices in Blackburn. Reports indicate that at least six Muslim women across the UK have been abused for wearing scarves or veils after Mr Straw’s remarks.
     
    6. A report leaked on 16 October 2006 suggested government guidelines for universities on tackling extremism would encourage staff to inform on students to Special Branch.