Secret Courts threat graver than ever after Government overturns Lords amendments to the Justice and Security Bill

06 February 2013

Today Amnesty International, JUSTICE, Liberty and Reprieve warned that the threat of Secret Courts is graver than ever after Ministers defied the House of Lords and reverted back to the original version of the highly damaging Justice and Security Bill.

Yesterday – as Westminster and the media concentrated on same-sex marriage – the House of Commons Committee responsible for scrutiny of the Bill passed new Government amendments which reverse changes to the Bill made by the Lords in November.

The Government suffered several large cross-party defeats on the legislation in the Upper House as Peers introduced a series of amendments. Those changes – supported by Labour, Liberal Democrats, Conservatives and Crossbenchers – improved the likelihood that Secret Courts would be used only as a genuine “last resort”.

Now, following intervention by government ministers, the “last resort” amendment has been overturned – meaning secret hearings could become the default in cases where the existing system for fairly handling sensitive material could have been used. If Ministers get their way then secret material – never disclosed to the claimant, let alone public or press – could routinely be used to defend serious allegations. The only people allowed to be present would be the judge, the Government itself and a Government-appointed Special Advocate.

Isabella Sankey, Director of Policy for Liberty, said:

“Peers’ tweaks barely improved this dangerous Bill but Ministers have reversed even these to make Secret Courts widely and routinely available. They insist they want Secret Courts only as a last resort – then scrap safeguards ensuring precisely that.

“Every day brings new examples of how secret justice would hide abuse – from women duped by undercover police to former Iraqi detainees alleging torture.”

The Justice and Security Bill now heads for Report Stage in the House of Commons – where there is likely to be a showdown vote to either entirely scrap Part 2 of the Bill (which contains the provisions for Secret Courts) or to reintroduce the House of Lords’ original amendments. Labour has reserved the option to vote against the legislation if the Government fails to make the case for it and a growing number of Conservative and Liberal Democrat backbenchers also oppose the Bill.

Meanwhile opposition elsewhere continues to mount. The Scottish Government does not want the Secret Courts provisions to apply to devolved areas in Scotland and the Scottish Liberal Democrats will debate a motion against the Bill next month. And Conservative MP Andrew Tyrie and Anthony Peto QC, of Blackstone Chambers, have published Neither Just nor Secure, a report for the Centre for Policy Studies, which rejects the legislation.

Contact: Liberty Press Office on 020 7378 3656 or 07973 831128

 NOTES TO EDITORS:

 1. Find out more about For Their Eyes Only, Liberty’s campaign against the Justice and Security Bill